帮我翻译下这段话````英文 I can't suffer from my headache so that I can't fall asleep at nights . I

have是什么意思？~

have的意思和用法

For many years, governments have tried to reduce smoking by taxing tobacco, running advertising campaigns and putting warnings on packets. Recently, several countries have also restricted the areas in which people may smoke. Most bans apply only to enclosed places (meaning inside buildings, e.g. shops, restaurants, bars, offices, theatres, trains, bus shelters etc). Smoking is banned in all or most enclosed public places in South Africa, New Zealand, Italy and the Republic of Ireland. There are similar bans in the American states of California and New York. Smoking in enclosed public places was recently banned in Scotland. It will become illegal in the rest of the UK in 2007. In England and Wales, pubs that do not serve food can continue to choose to allow smoking.
Bans on smoking in public places in the open air (e.g. parks, streets) are less common. Smoking is banned in some streets in Tokyo (Japan). Smoking near the entrances of buildings is banned in some parts of Australia, Canada and the USA.
The proposition must define this motion clearly. They must state whether they would ban smoking in all public places, or only in enclosed public places. They must also make it clear if there would be any major exceptions to the ban (e.g. pubs that do not serve food, private clubs open only to members). However, this debate often works best if the proposition do not introduce lots of exceptions.




同意的：
Scientists agree that smoking is dangerous. Tobacco smoke can cause cancer, strokes and heart disease. Smoking does not just harm the smoker – it also harms people nearby, who breathe in the smoke (this is called “passive smoking”). Smokers choose to smoke, but people nearby do not choose to smoke passively. People should only be exposed to harm if they understand the risks and choose to accept them. A complete ban on smoking in public is needed to protect people from passive smoking.




The opposition is wrong to say that people choose to smoke passively. In many places, there are no non-smoking bars or restaurants. Unless people refuse to go out with friends, they cannot avoid passive smoking. People who work in smoky workplaces (e.g. bars) often do not freely choose this sometimes no other jobs are available. In most countries, safety standards do not allow workers to be exposed to unnecessary danger, even if they agree. Workers should not be exposed to other people’s smoke, since they may not have made a free choice to do so.





A ban would encourage smokers to smoke less or give up. If smoking was banned in public places, it would no longer be a social activity. Instead, smokers would have to leave their friends inside and go outside to smoke. This would be particularly unpleasant when it is cold/wet. One third of smokers in Scotland said the ban was helping them to cut down. If smoking was a less social activity, fewer people would start smoking. In many countries, governments pay all or some of the cost of treating smoking-related diseases. This means that governments should have a right to discourage smoking.






People will not smoke more at home. Smokers need to maintain a certain level of nicotine in their blood to remain content. A ban on smoking in public would force them to smoke less while at work. Over time, this would lower the level of nicotine they need to feel content. This would reduce how often they need to smoke. They would therefore smoke less at home, as well as less at work.






It is more important to protect people’s health than to protect businesses. Pubs and clubs should adapt, for example by trying to earn more money from selling food. After a ban was introduced in New South Wales (Australia), only 9% of restaurants reported a drop in trade.






There have been few problems with bans where they have been introduced. Heavy fines put off companies from allowing people to smoke. A survey for the Scottish Executive found that 99.4% of premises were observing the ban three months after it was introduced.



Because when I pass someone who is smoking my nose burns, my eyes sting, and I get a sinus headache. I have become hypersensitive to the smell of cigarettes and when I am in my house and someone walks out side in front of the house I can smell it and all my symptoms occur. Hey I am entitled to my opinion and reasons and smoking stinks and effects others health as well.






不同意的：
Society accepts that adults can decide to harm themselves to some extent, so long as they do not harm others. This is why the proposition is not arguing that people should be banned from smoking in private. Passive smokers do choose to breathe in other people’s smoke. If they do not want to smoke passively, they do not need to go to places where smoking is allowed. There is therefore no reason to ban smoking in public.



If enough people want to go to non-smoking bars, companies will set up non-smoking bars. If there are no non-smoking bars, this suggests that very few people want them. Some people are quite happy to work in smoky places. In any case, workers should be allowed to choose to work in dangerous conditions. This is accepted for jobs like mining, fishing and the armed forces. Individuals decide that they are better doing this work than not having a job at all. A complete ban is not necessary to protect workers anyway – ventilation fans can remove most smoke.




It is legal to smoke tobacco, so governments have no right to try to make people stop. It is therefore wrong to argue that a ban on public smoking should be introduced to encourage people to give up. Smokers fund their own healthcare through the high taxes they pay on tobacco. In any case, heavy smokers are unlikely to give up since they are addicted to nicotine





Banning smoking in public will encourage people to smoke more at home. This will harm other people in their house, particularly children. This is important, since children are not old enough to choose freely to smoke passively. Also, people smoking at home may drink more alcohol than they would if they went to a bar. This is because they can buy it more cheaply at a supermarket or off-licence. Drinking more alcohol may lead to other health problems.





A ban on smoking in public places would drive many bars, pubs and clubs out of business. Smokers would not go to these places. These businesses would also earn less money from selling tobacco. In many places, pubs and Working Men’s Clubs are important social places for communities. They also provide jobs for people with few skills in places with little other work. It is therefore important that they survive.





It would be impossible to police this ban in many public places. Small workplaces will often ignore the ban and are unlikely to be caught. Staff who do not smoke are unlikely to report smokers, in case their colleagues work out who told the authorities





Just a few points.
If consuming tobacco is a civil liberty, then it should be a civil liberty to consume heroin, cocaine, ecstasy etc.
As for your other point
(1) cars are extremely useful; tobacco doesn't do much other than kill us.
(2) a lot of road deaths are caused by people being careless or breaking rules; exposure to passive smoking is harmful anyway
(3) Sorry but passive smoking is far more likely to kill you than jaywalking or being a car passenger. Check the stats. ALL US road deaths PUT TOGETHER come to about 43,000 annually. Passive smoking kills 53,000 US adults (plus a lot of children, don't know the exact fiigure) a year. Passive smoking deaths against jaywalking or passenger deaths? No contest.






众说纷纭的：
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/1920811.stm





完整文章：
There are many reasons why smoking should be banned in all public places. The most obvious is that it is unhealthy for the smoker, as well as everyone else near the smoker, especially in closed areas. Undisputed scientific studies emphasize that second-hand smoke is almost as medically hazardous to exposed non-smokers as it is to the smoker. Smoking is more than a habit; it is an addiction, and every step should be taken to discourage people, especially the young, from becoming addicted.

Children, chronically-ill people and the elderly are the most vulnerable to second-hand. It just takes a little longer for non-smokers who are exposed to develop the same ailments, including chronic throat and mouth irritation, emphysema and other lung problems as the addicted smoker.

Another reason smoking should be banned in all public spaces is that it is unpleasant to non-smokers. Where it is permitted in restaurants, bars, casinos, theaters, transportation and other places, it is simply that the inconsiderate smoker is imposing his/her addiction to the discomfort of others. If those persons must indulge in smoking, they should do it in designated indoor and outdoor areas where it will not annoy and/or sicken others.

As a personal note, during most of my working years, smoking was permitted just about everywhere. Except for showing off at age 13 by smoking an entire pack of cigarettes and getting very sick, I've never smoked since. However, until the era of banning some areas to smokers, I had to endure the annoying smell and discomfort in restaurants, theaters, airport lounges and many other places. When I attended business meetings in small rooms, i always had to hang my clothing out to air after I went home. It wasn't that I was allergic, as many unfortunate people are. I just found the smell of burning cigarettes, the breath and clothing of addicts annoying, their attitudes inconsiderate.

We who survived the many years before smoking in public places started to be banned are thankful that medical studies exposed the obvious. They proved that cigarettes are deadly to both the smoker and everyone else who must involuntarily be exposed to them. Of course, the medical studies revealed nothing new. As far back as the early 20th Century, cigarettes were called coffin nails. It's just that people finally woke up to the facts of the deadly consequences of smoking, and realized the culture created to enhance the profits of the tobacco companies was simply wrong.







完整文章2：
Imagine you are a smoker. Imagine that you have been a smoker for sixteen years. Imagine what a pain it becomes find a spot in someone's house or a restaurant where you can actually smoke. The laws against smoking are becoming stronger as time goes by, and you are running out of places to puff.

You have to go to the back room, outside, on the balcony, the porch, the weather is nasty, the mosquitoes are tearing you a new one, and while you smoke, you are out there all by your self while your friend is putting his best moves on the good looking girl at the party, leaving you with the wicked witch of oh my God please kill me, and you really aren't even enjoying the thing. It's just ridiculous. It becomes such a hassle to smoke, you finally decide to quit smoking altogether. And you eventually succeed. Well, let's just assume that you succeed, because you're probably weak in real life. Weak and soft.

Now imagine you are walking into a restaurant and as you enter the walkway to the entrance, you breathe in a billowing cloud of smoke and start gagging. Imagine that this happens again and again, everywhere you go, movie theaters, the local grocery store, every entryway, you find smokers gathered around for one last quick puff before entering the non-smoking building, and you realize ''This is what I've been doing to people. I have been ruining the quality of life for others while feeding my addiction all these years'' You quit smoking because it is so unhealthy, and hey, you want to live forever and ever. Now you find yourself choking on human exhaust fumes.

If you have ever been a non-smoker and were forced into close proximity to a smoker right after they put one out, the rank smell is enough to make your eyes water. Naturally, the smoker doesn't care. Like any other junkie, and that is what they are; a junkie, like anyone else that is slave to an addiction is a junkie, the smoker cares only about his fix, not about you, your child, his or her own children, or even about himself. All that matters is the next smoke.






完整文章3
One of my jobs is to be a booster for research on state and local government. In that capacity, I’m always a little sad that most people are captivated by the drama of presidential elections and bored by the nuts and bolts of local politics. Much of what is most important in our lives — the quality of our schools, the safety of our streets and the speed of our commutes — is determined at the local level.

Today, states and localities are on the front line of regulating drugs and tobacco. Last Tuesday, for example, Massachusetts decided to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana possession. As marijuana heads towards legalization, tobacco seems headed in the opposite direction. On Nov. 13, the Boston Public Health Commission will consider a sweeping ban on tobacco consumption, which would end the city’s four remaining cigar bars.

Does it make sense for localities to ban smoking tobacco and permit marijuana possession?

The friends of liberty favor freedom to smoke either substance. There is no reason to think that anyone’s natural goal either is or should be to maximize lifespan. The libertarian perspective is that individuals are the best judges of whether they want to take on the risks involved in either marijuana or tobacco.

Some people think that the libertarian viewpoint is undone by an increasing acceptance that people are not all that rational. I disagree. Accepting the limits on human rationality makes me more uncomfortable with allowing our elected or appointed officials to make decisions for us, because the effects of individual irrationality can be significantly increased when we delegate authority to elected officials. In Boston, government officials want to “de-normalize” smoking. In other places and other times, governments have wanted to “de-normalize” homosexuality. Perhaps we are better off without trusting the state to de-normalize anything.

Yet there are good reasons to regulate smoking that reflect the costs that smoking imposes on third parties.

Friends, parents and children all suffer at the death of a loved one, which means that paternalistic interventions that reduce the risk of death can be thought of as tools to protect the social fabric. The public health case against smoking emphasizes the consequences to third parties of second-hand smoke. Reducing adult smoking may eliminate role models who lead children to light up. After all, people do smoke less when their friends and peers and spouses stop smoking. I’m not sure that cigar bars create such large costs to outsiders, but perhaps “de-normalization” will induce a few fewer children to smoke, and it is hard to be against that.

This high-level discussion of the trade-offs between liberty and health ignores the local element that is the key attribute of the bans. The bans in cities like Boston (and in New York, where smoking has been prohibited in almost all restaurants and bars since 2003) are local ordinances, not global prohibitions. Anyone who does not like them can move elsewhere. Cities regulate plenty of behavior in public spaces, and it is well within the regulatory power of city governments to regulate smoking as well. New York is surely seen by many as a more pleasant place because of Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s smoking ban.

Some Asian cities, like Tokyo and Hong Kong, far less aggressively ban smoking within cafes or bars, but far more aggressively ban smoking in parks and on streets. That seems at least as sensible to me as banning smoking in bars, which are generally off limits to children. After all, no one ever confused a Blarney Stone with a health spa.

My own view is that there is not one right or wrong answer on smoking bans, which brings us back to the glories of local government.

Local rules allow people to choose a town with rules that work for them. If parents want to bring up their children in a smoke-free environment, then it is a good thing that they can choose a town that bans smoking. If twenty-something hipsters want to find a place where marijuana is treated liberally, then it is attractive that such places exist as well. We can tolerate far more regulation at the local level than we ever should at the national level, because people get to choose their locality.

And now I have got to put out my cigar and go back to work.

人工翻译(⊙o⊙)，希望你心情能好起来！！！开开心心。

I can't suffer from my headache so that I can't fall asleep at nights . I dread taking up residence at an indifferent home. I really want to leave. I tried to bring about a reconciliation between he and I. But it does not work. I was struck by the sudden realization that I would probably never see him again.
我再也受不了头痛的折磨，夜里，我无眠。我讨厌在一个冷漠的家里永久的定居下来，真的，我很想离开。我试着在他和我之间做一个调和，但是这无用。我很迷茫，有时突然意识到，我很可能将与他不再见面。

I am an indecisive girl. When he is in one of his rages, I just cry and say nothing. I am so frightened. It's sensible of me to have a discussion with he tonight. Because he calm down now.
我是一个优柔寡断的女孩，当他愤怒的时候，我却只能哭泣，什么也不能说。我感到非常的害怕！ 我知道，今晚我将与他谈一谈，因为现在他已经平静了下来。

由于不能忍受头疼的折磨，我整夜不能入睡。在这个冷漠的家里居住让我感到恐惧。我真的想离开这里。我试着和他和平相处。但是没有用。我突然意识到，我将再也看不到他。
我是一个优柔寡断的女孩。每次他盛怒的时候，我只是哭泣，什么也说不出来。我吓坏了。今晚我应该和他谈一谈，因为他现在已经平静下来了。

我不能忍受我的头痛,所以我不能入睡,夜。我害怕定居在一个无关紧要的家里。我真的想要离开了。我想给他和我达成和解,但它不能正常工作了。我突然意识到我大概是不会再见到他了。
我是一位优柔寡断的女孩。当他在他的泛滥,我哭了,说不出话来。我感到很害怕。这是明智的,我有一个讨论与他今晚。因为他平静下来了。

I can't suffer from my headache so that I can't fall asleep at nights .
在夜里我不能忍受我的头痛,所以我不能入睡。
I dread taking up residence at an indifferent home. I really want to leave.
我真的想要离开了，我害怕定居在一个冷漠的的家里。
I tried to bring about a reconciliation between he and I.
我试着在他和我之间做一个调和，但是这没有用的
But it does not work. I was struck by the sudden realization that I would probably never see him again.
我突然意识到我大概是不会再见到他了。因为他不能正常工作了。

I am an indecisive girl.
我是一个优柔寡断的女孩
When he is in one of his rages,I just cry and say nothing.
当他愤怒的时候，我却只能哭泣，什么也不能说。
I am so frightened.
我感到非常的害怕！
It's sensible of me to have a discusstion with he tonight. Because he calm down now.
我知道，今晚我将与他谈一谈，也许现在他已经平静了下来。

孩子这文章是从哪里来的？

---

眉县17818199617： 帮我用英文翻译下这段话.你知道我们为什么会发展到今天这种地步?最主要的原因是你没有给我足够的时间来和你相处.我每时每刻都想和你在一起,但是每... - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] You know why our relationship come to be like this?the main reason is you did not give me enough time to be with you.I want to stay with you every single minute,yet it is so difficult to see you.just drop your restrainst and be a common folk,let us stay ...

眉县17818199617： 英语翻译请帮我翻译下这段话:我喜欢这样的工作:1.有品位;2.能够管理一个店铺. - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] I love this kind of job: Firstly,to do this job,it can reflect you have good taste(从事这样一份工作可以反映出你很有品位); Secondly,it can provide me a chance to manage a store(可以提供我管理店铺的机会). 稍作了修改以便翻译更清晰正确

眉县17818199617： 英语翻译请问谁能帮我用英文翻译下这段话呢?我不懂英文,但又很想这段话用英文说翻出来.亲爱的,你知道,我总有一天会离开你,亲爱的请不要怪我,... - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] 总有一天我会离开你I will leave you one dayDear, you know, one day I will leave you, dear Please do not blame me, and I'll have, but in doing so I really, I can not unfilial, my parents did not raise s...

眉县17818199617： 英语翻译请哪位英语高手帮我翻译一下这段话:“我要你知道,这个世界上有一个人会永远等着你.无论什么时候,无论你在什么地方,反正你知道总会有这样... - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] I want you to know that in this world there will have a person waiting for you forever .Whenever,regardless of you in any place,you knew in any case there will have this kind of person waiting for you.

眉县17818199617： 求英语高手.谁能帮我翻译下这段话...i have not talked to youfor ages.I just want toknow how you are.wish everything isvery good with u.keeping health.... - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] 我没有跟你年龄我只是想要toknow你如何are.wish一切与u.keeping health.happyfaminy交通良好.希望从遥远的地方

眉县17818199617： 英语翻译在乎你 丶你是我的一切若不在乎你了丶你就屁都不是所以丶请你珍惜我上面这段话帮我用英文翻译下, - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] I care about you; You are everything of me If I don't mind you; You mean nothing. Therefore,please cherish me(或者treasure me)

眉县17818199617： 英语翻译帮我用英语翻译一下这段话:{请相信我,我只想好好的爱你^^^^^^也请不要再问爱你有多深,我想告诉你的是我的心只属于你就够了.真的很爱你,想... - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] Please believe me,I just want to love you,Jeanne good Please do not ask how deep love you,I want to tell you is my heart belongs to you enough. Really love you,and you do want a lifetime ... We must believe! Love your sweet

眉县17818199617： 英语翻译帮我翻译一下这段话好吗?翻译成英文:我和爸爸到北京八达岭长城玩.我们用照相机和手机拍下了我们度过的快乐时光;我和爸爸一起吃了苹果、零... - ？
霍鲍护固：[答案] My father and I to Beijing badaling Great Wall.We use the camera phones and snapped the happy days we spent,My father and I eat apples,snacks,potato chips,candy and cookies.Very not easy I climbed up the mountain and the final piece in the great ...

眉县17818199617： 帮我把这段话翻译成英文.？
霍鲍护固： Dear NaNa you do not escape me, you do not feel remorse, you do not I'm sorry to anyone. Did you know? I wish I was that I can accompany you for a lifetime, I fear you do not hurt others. I do not care how you think the future of the future, I hope to ...

眉县17818199617： 帮我用英语翻译一下下面这段话？
霍鲍护固： I don't wish you could go with me very far,but I wish you could stay with me till the end of life.I wish God could make us live happily all our lives if possible.