The question of what children learn, and how they should lea?

作者&投稿:咸诸 (若有异议请与网页底部的电邮联系)
~ 8-12 DACBA

8. 推断题。由第一段第二句“鹦鹉学舌般地课文学习、附带鞭子的语法教学”可知,这种学习孩子非常被动。
9. 细节题。由第一段最后一句可知:我们必须懂得孩子们的需要,还要尊重孩子们。
10. 细节题。由第二段中“教师过多担心功课的心理暗示,忽略了功课本身”可知。
11. 推断题。由第二段中Why teach children to write grammatical sentences? Verbal expression is better可推断出。
12. 细节题。由最后一段中Frequently the modem methods…fail to be understood by the teachers,let alone the children可知。,1,The question of what children learn, and how they should learn, is continually being debated and redebated. Nobody dares any longer to defend the old system, the learning of lessons parrot-fashion, the grammar-with-a-whip system, which was good enough for our grandparents. The theories of modem psychology have stepped in to argue that we must understand the need of children. Children are not just *** all *** s; they are children who must be respected as much.
Well, you may say, this is as it should be, a good idea. But think further. What happens? "Education" bees the responsibility not of teachers, but of psychologists (心里学家). What happens then? Teachers worry too much about the psychological implications (暗示) of their lessons, and forget about the subjects themselves. If a child dislikes a lesson, the teacher feels that it is his fault, not the child’s. So teachers worry whether history is "relevant" to modern young children. And do they dare to recount stories about violence? Or will this make the children themselves violent? Can they tell their classes about children of different races, or will this encourage racial hatred? Why teach children to write grammatical sentences? Verbal expression is better. Sums? Arithmetic? No: Real-life mathematical situations are more understandable.
You see, you can go too far. Influenced by educational theorists, who have nothing better to do than to write books about their ideas, teachers leave their teacher-training colleges filled with grand, psychological ideas about children and their needs. They make elaborate, sophisticated (精致的,复杂的) preparations and try out their "modem methods" on the long-suffering children. Since one "modem method" rapidly replaces another the poor kids will have had a good bellyful by the time they leave school. Frequently the modem methods are so sophisticated that they fail to be understood by the teachers, let alone the children; even more often, the relaxed discipline so essential for the " informal" feelings the class must have, prevents all but a handful of children from learning anything.
8. People do not dare defend the old system mainly because under the old system________.
A. too much grammar was taught to children B. children were spoiled (宠坏)
C. children were treated as grown-ups D. children were made to learn passively(被动的)
9. What view do the modem psychologists hold?
A. Children must be understood and respected.
B. Children are *** all *** s and know what they need.
C. Children are better off without learning lessons.
D. Education of children is the responsibility of psychologists.
10. What happens when teachers pay too much attention to the psychology of their lessons?
A. They find that the children dislike the lessons.
B. They tend to blame students for their failure.
C. They do not pay enough attention to the actual lessons.
D. They no longer want to teach children history.
11. Grammatical sentences are regarded as unimportant because ________.
A. it is better to use verbs only
B. words are said out of natural feelings only
C. talking freely and naturally without sentences is a better form of expression
D. it is felt that formal grammar rules might cause unnatural expressions
12. According to the passage, the modern methods are understood by ________.
A. neither teachers nor pupils B. only a handful of teachers and pupils
C. the more sophisticated teachers D. everyone who enjoys the relaxed discipline of the informal classes


沅江市19558699861: 请问the question of 后面可以+句子吗 -
戎牵弗贝: 第一句对了 第二句错了 the question of 就像because of一样的用法,of后面只能接短语或从句而不是接一个句子 如果第二句要成要用the question of 的话 应该改成 the question of that computer will replace TV

沅江市19558699861: The question of whether English will continue changing in the future is easy to answer. -
戎牵弗贝: “将来英语(语言)是否会不断的变化”这个问题是很容易找到答案的/很容易回答的.

沅江市19558699861: 英语语法:the answer - --- - the question介词填of还是to还是for? -
戎牵弗贝: 是to 的所有格用法,你记住一些固定用法就可以了! the key to the door the answer to the question the bridge to the river the way to the station the entrance to the cinema the exit to the gym

沅江市19558699861: now you wil be a - ---to answer the question of w----to "play the game or not" -
戎牵弗贝: able whether

沅江市19558699861: if 和wether的区别和联系? -
戎牵弗贝: whether和if的用法区别 1)whether和if常用来引导宾语从句,这时两者的含义区别很小,一般可通用.例如: ①I don't know whether/if they will come to help us. 我不知道他们是否来帮助我们. ②I am not sure whether/if I'll have time to go with you. ...

沅江市19558699861: out Of question和out of the question的区别? -
戎牵弗贝: ”out of the question“中的“the”在这里的用法是”特指“,也就是说之前已经提到过这个问题. “out Of question”是泛指,也就是说,不具有针对某一个问题,而是针对的某一类问题.

沅江市19558699861: The question which will be discussed next week has something ()our...
戎牵弗贝: Out of question和out of the question的主要区别是: 1、out of question意为"毫无疑问",是个副词短语,意思和beyond question相同.例:Her kindness was out of question.她的善心是毫无疑问的. 2、out of the question意为"不可能"...

沅江市19558699861: 男友说要跟我分手,他说他们家都是英语很厉害,说我不懂英语,跟他们家人相处没共同语言,给我出英语翻译 -
戎牵弗贝: 你写的英语没写完吧,是从第三点开始的,且他在说我不理解他要表达的意思,大概就收说是算命并不代表你的命运就如算命说的那样一成不变,该掌握在自己的手里,算命只是一个学说,能不能做出人生指导,他也不清楚.很乱,不知道他要...

本站内容来自于网友发表,不代表本站立场,仅表示其个人看法,不对其真实性、正确性、有效性作任何的担保
相关事宜请发邮件给我们
© 星空见康网