英语辩论赛:经济增长与环境保护在中国哪个应该优先？

辩论资料：保护环境比发展经济更重要！！急！！！！！~

经济发展就像人体的胃，胃时时刻刻在运转在消化，一点点不舒服人体都能立刻感觉到，可以想办法解决；而环境问题则不同，它就像人体的肝，肝的问题都是累积的，等到爆发的时候才发现，早已经晚了。

在去年7月份，我曾去台湾旅游，本想专程去看望那里的团团圆圆两个熊猫，可非常不巧，我去的那几天，由于天气太热，大熊猫们已经被转移到蜀山去避暑了。对方辩友您知不知道，如果温室效应继续发展下去的话，恐怕蜀山都没有办法避暑了，它们恐怕要到喜马拉雅山去了。

今天中国，由于过大的人口压力，导致我们要实施计划生育政策，不是叫大家不要生，是叫大家生少一点，不是让大家不要发展经济，是说经济发展延缓一点。我方的论证难道对方辩友不能理解吗?

如今经济发展的领军产业是信息产业，请问对方辩友知不知道信息产业每年要耗费多少剧毒的化学物质？信息产业仅在1999年，就用了世界上300万吨剧毒物质来提炼硅，制造芯片，对方辩友不要只看到无边钞票滚滚来，看不到一江毒水向东流啊！

当我们看着地球上的物种一个又一个消失的时候，你们要怎么告诉我，人类不是下一个！

我方不否认经济发展的重要性，可我们不是来讨论二者是否都重要的，我们是来讨论当二者发生冲突的时候我们应该具有的价值排序——即：谁更重要！谁都愿意开小汽车和干净水，问题在于当二者不可兼备时，大家是愿意开小汽车喝水俣湾的污水呢？还是愿意骑自行车喝干净水！

没有了经济资源，那么我们还可以资助您嘛。如果没有了环境资源，谁能来资助地球呢？难道我们可能去幻想火星人或阿凡达来救助我们吗？

经济发展晚了两年，国家顶多晚进步两年，环境保护晚了两年，生物就会灭绝，雨林就会消失，这样的急迫是不容等待的。

对方辩友的经济重要论，就是把经济放在第一要位，而对于环境保护则是明日复明日，明日何其多，如果在这样的情况下日日待环保，恐怕我们这星球上的生命真的被你们要万古蹉跎了呀！

对方辩友说经济发展可以促进环境保护，那么我想请问对方辩友了，在经济发展最快的工业革命时期，为什么却促进出了八大公害，十大污染，十六大环境问题呢？

对方辩友似乎是认为，如果一个问题你没有办法解决，想不出办法解决，难道他就不重要了？

对方辩友忽视环境问题的确会得到经济的快速发展，的确我们也会赚到大把大把的钞票，可没有环境没有了物种，我们也只能拿他来买更华丽的棺材而已。

二反击辩词：


反击辩词：
问：当一个人分文没有之时，是先解决吃穿问题，还是饿着肚子去植树造林呢？？？（或其他钱的问题，如发放资金等等。）
驳：对方辩友方才提到了分文没有——也就是指钱的问题，我想提醒对方辩友，经济发展并不等同于钱的多少，经济二字也并不单单的等同于钱。如果对方辩友一定要强调钱也是经济的一部分，那么我不妨用钱举一个例子。我们上山游玩，经常会看到一块牌子上写着：护林防火，人人有责，吸烟者罚款50元。这说明了什么？不是正是说明了，谁不保护环境，谁就要付出经济的代价么！试问，环境与经济，谁更重要！如果真的经济发展重要，为什么国家不反过来规定：谁盗窃了50元，就罚谁入林带烟，放火烧山！

问：当一个人衣食住行都无法解决之时，如何能去保护环境。
驳：对方辩友说在此时衣食住行如此重要，难道是认为衣食住行代表着经济么？错了，它恰恰代表着环境。我要告诉对方辩友，衣食住行也好，柴米油盐酱醋茶也好，这些都是从我们地球的环境中来的。他们的材料都属于地球环境，而不是天外飞来的，太空中落下来的。我相信在座各位谁都不是吃冥王星的大米穿北极星的衣服长大的吧。现在就对方辩友刚才的问题，我想反问，当地球的环境资源消耗没了，我们吃穿的材料都没有了，衣食住行都无法解决了，又如何发展经济？

问：如果一个国家经济发展极弱，人民生活在吃不饱穿不暖的苦境中，我们怎么能逼迫人家去植树造林，保护环境，这不是太残忍了吗？
驳：我们今天的论题是经济发展与环境保护谁更重要，而不是谁重要，谁干脆就不重要。为什么对方辩友这么喜欢用如此极端的例子来冠以欲加之罪呢？如果对方辩友非要问在一个毫无经济基础的地方保护环境可行与否。那么我方是否也可以问假设在一个毫无环境基础可言的哈雷彗星上发展经济可行与否呢？

问：非洲现在沙漠化很严重，但你和它们讲，我快饿死啦，但我先要种草，像话吗？
驳：如果没有美国人，没有欧洲人跑去那边为了经济乱开发，你觉得非洲人真的要面临今天这样的窘境吗？

问：对方辩友一直说要环境保护，可环境保护是什么呢？难道是举着牌子写上环境保护吗？难道环境保护不需要实际行动吗？实际的行动不需要物质的支持吗? 在保护环境的过程中，不需要投入人力财力物力吗？如果没有经济的发展，又如何又能力去环境保护呢？
驳：可对方辩友，经济发展了，人不一定去拯救地球。国家可能会拿来进行综合建设，企业进行扩大在生产，人们可能跑去看电影，回去买奢侈品。对方辩友，如果不把环境保护放在优先，你怎么知道地球还有救呢？

因为经济发展了，美国（或其他某国）才能每年拿出24.7亿元去改善环境，如果经济不发展美国能出得起这么多钱吗？
驳：美国（或其他某国）之所以要花那么多财力来解决环境问题，是因为它们在经济发展时候制造了太多问题啦！而且对方辩友的逻辑也非常有意思。大家不妨想想看，如果一个人每年要花10多万元去医院看病，那到底是说明了他有钱呢？还是他有病呢?（语气停顿1秒以上） 相比给她更多的钱去治病，那不得病，不更好么。

结尾陈词：


…………（先要指出对方问题，视实际情况）
综上所述：对方辩友今天的言论漏洞百出，逻辑支离破碎，而纵观对方的观点更是一个在理论上存在矛盾，在事实上不切实际，在实践危害人类生存的观点，这样的论调，如何能让大家接受？
而我方今天的观点则是保护环境比经济发展更重要。
首先：保护环境和发展经济的对比在我们身边随处可见。
试问：当我们能收看到一千多个电视频道，却收看不到头顶一片蓝天的时候，我们会觉得这是我们想要的吗？
当我们衣着光鲜的走在大路上，耳畔却听不到鸟语花香之时，您还会觉得，这是您想还要的吗？
当我们在这里辩论的时间内，全球就有三个物种已经灭绝，您还会觉得环境问题的忽视不是一件令人痛心疾首的事情吗？
其次：我们不妨一起来看一下，下面这些赤裸裸的事实。
二零零七年夏，温室效应使得法国达到了历史上的最高温度，滚滚热浪直接夺走了人的生命，而且不是一个两个，一下子就是3万多个活生生的生命，这还不够使人惊悚吗？
在看看历史上日本的水俣湾事件的伤害，再看美国的洛杉矶光化学烟雾中的孩子，想象一下比利时马斯河谷烟雾中的少年和伦敦雾都劫难里徘徊的那些生灵吧，对方辩友，难道这些都丝毫不能打动您的铁石心肠？
面对如此迫在眉睫的环境危机，我们讨论早已不仅仅是一个意识中的真理，更是我们在座各位的性命啊！我方实在看不出来人类还有什么其他的选择，就如美国前总统候选人高尔曾经说过说：保护环境已经是一个攸关生死存亡的关键，它不是一个选择，因为我们根本没有选择。
再次：主要矛盾和次要矛盾决定事物的发展方向，矛盾的主要方面决定事物的性质。如今主要矛盾是环境问题，可对方如何视而不见呢？举个例子吧：自古忠孝难两全，忠孝二者谁更重要一直是争论不休的焦点，我想请问现在国难当头，忠与孝那个更重要呢？当然是忠。因为我们要站在一个事实的层面审视主次矛盾。现在的事实是国难当头，因此忠更重要。现在的事实情况是环境危机已经非常严重，因此我们说：环境保护，更重要啊！
最后，我要说明的是：我们今天的辩题是经济发展与环境保护二者谁更重要。可对方今天向我们不断的阐释经济发展如何如何重要，却始终没有说明经济发展是如何比环境保护更重要的。这正是犹抱琵琶半遮面，千呼万唤始不出来！那么我方要如何证明环境比经济发展，更重要呢！很简单，孟子有云，鱼与熊掌皆其所欲，不可得兼则舍鱼而取熊掌。比较两个事物谁更重要，我们不妨就用孟子这个二者只能择其一的方法。先假设没有了环境，我们赖以生存的家园被毁灭了，世界上的物种均消亡了，请问对方辩友此时人类都不存在了，经济发展又有何用？而我们再假设经济不存在了，可是我们还有我们赖以生存的自然环境，此时，大不了是人生豪迈从头再来.五千年后中国依旧是一条东方巨龙！大千世界的秀美山河，不仅仅是经济的富足就可以取代的！古语有云：留得青山在，不怕没柴烧！正是这个道理.问渠那得清如许，为有源头活水来！没错，我们相信，只要青山依在绿水仍流，只要江山大好风光不被践踏，经济便终有一天会复苏，社会终将会和谐而蓬勃的发展！
今天，短短一场辩论，不可能阐述清楚人与自然这个永恒的话题。我只想恳请通过我方的努力能使在做的各位，多一些理性的思考，少一些盲目的热情。这只是因为，我们不愿意看到，当文明的喧嚣远去之后，剩下的，只有伤痕累累的地球;只是因为，我们不愿意去想象，当下个世纪的阳光普照大地的时候，迎接他的，却是一个寂静的春天！谢谢大家！


网上有相关视频的~1999凌云杯;全国大学生辩论赛决赛 中国科技大学VS武汉大学

China is a developing country, and in the socialist modernization drive in the process of economic development and environmental protection often conflict. We need to protect the environment of economic development.

First, we must protect the environment of economic development is the essential requirement of economic development. Economic development is to improve people's living standards. China's economic development is to solve the people's increasing material and cultural needs. Born Out of China's semi-colonial and semi-feudal agricultural country. Weak economic foundation, a low level of industrialization, in the course of economic development and economic development in the protection of the environment prevailing contradictions. Protection of the environment including the protection of people's living environment and the natural environment. Exist in the city economic development especially industrial development on the lives of the residents have a negative impact on the situation in the rural areas there is more damage the natural environment and ecological environment. The purpose of economic development is to improve people's living standards, and the process of development because of damage to the environment affect people's lives, and contrary to the original intent of economic development.

Second, we must protect the environment of economic development is the strategy of sustainable development requirements. The environment we live in, our future generations have to live here. We destroy the environment of economic development, some damage is irreparable, the future generations of crime. Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development research, vigorously develop the green industry, and pollution-free industries. China is a civilization with a long history and a big country in the process of economic development should also attach importance to environmental protection, to leave our future generations a better living space.

Third, we must protect the environment of economic development is a natural law requirements. The process of economic development, if the serious damage to the natural environment, then we will be natural to be severely punished. Major floods caused damage to the environment are the inevitable result. In the floods in the consumption of manpower, material and financial fear of the expense of the environment more than the fruits of economic development. The laws of nature is merciless, who violated it who will be its revenge. We must attach great importance to the process of economic development in the protection of the natural environment and social environment.

Fourth, economic development and resolve conflicts protection of the environment is the fundamental way to further economic development. Development is the last word. We can not lose the economic development and the protection of the environment, not because of the ground to protect the environment in the development of economic issues before the vine. Way is economic development. It is necessary to strengthen environmental awareness and use our brains. Economic development and environmental protection are not necessarily contradictory. On the contrary, economic development should promote environmental protection. Extensive multi-level high-technology development, industrial pollution-free green. The development of the economy, the prosperity of the country, the level of development of productive forces, people conquering nature's ability to transform nature will be further strengthened. People not only have the ability to protect the environment, but also the environment can be rebuilt. Desert will be transformed into farmland. Economic development is the way to protect the environment.

Fifth, the whole society should attach importance to developing the economy and protecting the environment. At present many places, there are many sectors of the expense of the environment and developing the economy. This is historical and practical reasons, but look at the use of the development issue, people will be even more profound understanding of the economic development process of the importance of environmental protection, leaders at all levels should establish environmental awareness, from the strategic height of the development of knowledge economy and the protection of the environment , based on the overall situation into consideration in the protection of the environment at the same time vigorously developing the economy and improving the people's standard of living.

In short, protecting the environment and economic development are not contradictory. In the process of economic development must pay attention to protecting the environment.
Because pollution will, of course, cause harm. Earth is a circle of the world. In fact, there is no absolute on the planet waste. All things can be recycled. But human intervention so that the deviation in this cycle, there has been not the cycle of things. For example, the styrofoam boxes years ago. If this is the case, then, is a vicious circle. That the Earth's resources will be consumed End. Well, the earth dangerous. Protective measures should be as close to the Earth's self-cycle. Prevention should do more "farsightedness" and not always stare in the economic goals. Should be from the perspective of the humanities and natural starting

英语辩论——环境保护 VS 经济发展(经济发展正方） Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth. 正 方 陈 词 ： Good morning everyone! We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s environment growth that should be chosen. I have three reasons to prove this point. First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries. So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy. Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection. We can develop our economy without environment pollution. Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win. In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China. 反方陈词：We agree economic growth is needed. But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence. What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much. By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position. At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment. So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past. That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority. Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably. That’s all I want to say. 自由辩论 正方二辩：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live. Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our economies? 反方二辩：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present . Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high .But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly. We have money, but being under the sub health condition. Does it make any sense, opponent debaters? 正方三辩：There do exist some eastern cities whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people. The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China. We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research. They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy. I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength. 反 方 三 辩 ： Environmental protection needs economy . But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth. If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection. The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment. Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important? 正方：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy. We admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit .But we should still take economic construction as the central task. 反方： admit economic construction is our country’s principle task .But we have to insist We on sustainable development while developing economy. We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development. 总结： 正方总结：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth” .I think what they said can’t come true at present . It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy. 反方总结: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy” .The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises. As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration. Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy. If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it .But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust. The urgency like this can’t wait. So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China. Thank you

交大城院英语系学生甲表示毫无压力。。。

---

绵阳市13918285497： 英语辩论赛:经济增长与环境保护在中国哪个应该优先? - ？
恽侮盐酸： 英语辩论——环境保护 VS 经济发展(经济发展正方) Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth. 正 方 陈 词 : Good morning everyone! We are here now debating about whether environment protection...

绵阳市13918285497： 英语辩论经济增长与环境保护哪个更重要 - ？
恽侮盐酸： ,辩论,经济,发展,英语辩论,经济发展,保护环境更重要,环境保护,哪个更重要,辩论赛,发展经济,经济增长,经济增长率,中国经济增长率,中国经济增长,经济增长方式,经济增长理论,经济增长点,经济增长速度

绵阳市13918285497： 英语辩论 在中国经济发展和环境保护哪个应优先 - ？
恽侮盐酸： 你是财大的 其实在这个辩论中最主要的是找FACT就可以了 比如新型混合动力汽车使用、温室效应等等 自己弄

绵阳市13918285497： 经济发展和环境保护哪个更重要?辩论词,最好用英文版的拜求英文版辩论词:经济发展与环境保护哪个更重要? - ？
恽侮盐酸：[答案] China is a developing country,and in the socialist modernization drive in the process of economic development and environmental protection often conflict.We need to protect the environment of economic...

绵阳市13918285497： 英语辩论一辩陈词经济发展比保护环境更重要 - ？
恽侮盐酸： 二反击辩词:反击辩词: 问:当一个人分文没有之时,是先解决吃穿问题,还是饿着肚子去植树造林呢???(或其他钱的问题,如发放资金等等.) 驳:对方辩友方才提到了分文没有——也就是指钱的问题,我想提醒对方辩友,经济发展并...

绵阳市13918285497： 英语辩论赛辩题是which should receive prority in china ,economic growth or environmental potection? - ？
恽侮盐酸： 你的论点是什么?辩论总要有论点的.你是经济还是环境?如果是经济的话,应该着重在发展,也就是开源,因为经济到达一定程度,科技也就会发展到一定程度,新技术成果会对中国环境改善产生很大的效用,这是开源,以英国为例,先破坏再保护,到一定程度后科技就会发挥威力,比如先进的汽车发动机对环境的破化已经大幅减小,新一代燃料电池技术几乎不破坏环境.如果是环境,应该注重保护,也就是节流.不管经济如何发展,只有在预先对环境进行保护才能以最小的代价获得这场战争的胜利,例如澳大利亚严禁开采其内陆地区的地下水来保持生态环境.希望对你有帮助.

绵阳市13918285497： 英语辩论赛 观点环境比经济重要的总结稿 - ？
恽侮盐酸： China is a developing country, and in the socialist modernization drive in the process of economic development and environmental protection often conflict. We need to protect the environment of economic development.First, we must protect the ...

绵阳市13918285497： 英语辩论:保护环境还是选择经济? 我认为应选择经济 - ？
恽侮盐酸： 英语中辩论以及作文题二选一都没有准确的答案,无论哪一种都可以,没有正确与错误之分,需要的是在选择其中一种情况下提供确切的论据,做到言而有理,不能两个都选.汉语则不同,必须二选一

绵阳市13918285497： 求助!明天要打一个辩论赛,辩题是:经济发展与环境保护能不能并行.我是反方:不能并行.求各位的观点! - ？
恽侮盐酸： 这是一个不用辨,辩论赛.肯定可以并行.明白两点就成了.第一,经济必须发展,不发展,难不成倒退.第二,污染了,肯定要治理,不然没法保证人们的生存环境.

绵阳市13918285497： 班里要开辩论赛,经济发展vs环境保护,我要讲的是经济发展,求经济发展(我方)这方面的辩词 - ？
恽侮盐酸： 开篇理论:谢谢主席,各位评委,观众,对方辩友下午(上午/晚上)好.我方坚持认为:经济发展可以避免环境恶化.我将从以下几点来论证我方的观点.第一,经济基础决定上层建筑.发展经济可以为保护环境提供基础.发展经济,可以为避免环境恶化以及保护环境提供更好的条件.第二,经济发展带动科技发展,而科技是第一生产力.我方认为,经济发展带动科技发展,为我们避免环境恶化,保护环境带来更强大的科技保障,使我们更好的避免环境恶化,达到事半功倍....(我暂时只想到一点...我果然还是比较擅长攻辩...亲,加油哦,祝你们辩论赛成功!!)