斯洛伐克对于气候问题的看法

气候问题对斯洛伐克的影响？~

SLOVAKIA

According to the report on CO2 emissions from fuel combustion from the International energy agency, Slovakia has produced 36,8 millions of tons of CO2 in 2007. The most significant amount of greenhouse gases in Slovakia comes from burning and transformation of fossil fuels (75 - 80 %). When it comes to the question of using energy from renewable sources, Slovakia has set it target at 6% of the total energy consumption until 2010. Biofuels should account for 5,57 % until 2010. In 2007 the energy from renewable sources represented 3,5 % of the total consumption of primary energy in Slovak republic. Hydro energy is the only source of renewable energy which has a significant share on the total energy consumption.

Public opinion
The attitude of Slovak citizens towards questions related to climate change is similar to those in the whole European Union. According to the Eurobarometer on European attitudes towards climate change, 41 % of Slovak citizens think that climate change is the most serious problem facing the world currently. When asked how serious the issue of climate change is at the moment, 66% of Slovaks believe that it is very serious and 76 % of the respondents do not believe that the issue has been exaggerated. When it comes to blaming who is not doing enough to fight climate change, 59 % blame the national government. However, when asked how much more would they be prepared to pay for energy which emits less greenhouse gases 24% would not be willing to do so at all, 28% would pay 1 - 5 % more and 3 0% do not know.

Slovakia's emissions trading scandal
During 2009 Slovakia experienced a scandal related to emission trading. Not only did Slovakia sell its emissions at a price deep under the average selling price at the time of the trade, but also the real existence of the company InterBlue Group to which Slovakia sold its emissions is questioned. According to available data, Slovakia lost approximately 75 mil. eur by selling its emissions under the conditions of the contract signed with InterBlue. The whole case was intensively investigated by Slovak journalists and lead to serious findings. The findings also led to removing two ministers of environment and constant change of opinions and arguments of the prime minister and other responsible politicians. At first, they have denounced the whole case.

Currently InterBlue Group should still pay Slovakia EUR 15 million, but the company has no contact person and the contract is not valid anymore.

Slovakia at COP15 in Copenhagen
The Slovak position at the the Copenhagen Summit on climate change in December 2009 was corresponding with the official position of the European Union. Slovakia as part of the EU has offered a reduction target of 30% in case that other developed and developing countries will also participate at an appropriate level in the global reduction. If the other countries will not be willing to participate at reducing the emissions, Slovakia has set its target at 20% until 2020, compared to the level in 1990. Concerning the question of the financial assistance of Slovakia for developing countries to counter the climate changes in the so called “fast start financing”, Slovakia will contribute with 9 million euro.

A key priority for Slovakia was to achieve a legally binding outcome during the negotiations in Copenhagen, which would guarantee environmental integrity, fairness and a chance to achieve a global target on CO2. According to Helena Princová, a member of the Slovak delegation in Copenhagen and a contact person for UNFCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) working at the section on climate change and trading with emission quotas at the Ministry of environment, this is only possible by connecting at the moment individual negotiations: “Long- term Cooperative Action” (LCA) and Kyoto Protocol (KP), whereas key elements of the KP should be preserved.

Slovakia also supported specific proposals for a financial architecture which would include more accurate rules for informing and verifying, in order to achieve support for national initiatives (NAMAs - Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Measures) aimed at reducing the effects of the changed climate. Furthermore Slovakia supported the initiative aimed at reforming the already existing and introduce new flexible mechanisms countering climate change for example methodology for land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) sector and also management of the surplus of Kyoto emission permissions (AAUs – Assigned Amount Units).

In line with the national interests of Slovakia, the representatives at the Copenhagen Summit on Climate change were closely monitoring and participating at discussions on the following issues; reaching a final decision on the outcomes of the Ad Hoc Working Group (AWG) on the Kyoto Protocol, which has proposed an amendment of the Protocol and the AWG LCA with its proposal of a protocol for UNFCCC.

The final decision should lead to meeting the generally set target goals. Slovakia was also highly supportive of creating a mechanism which would finance the climate change politics, initiatives and adaptations after the year 2012. Another move towards meeting the targets and goals would be to enable the transfer of unused Kyoto emission permissions into the next binding periods. In order for the LULUCF to function well, the Slovak representatives were in favor of creating a methodology for assigning emissions and captures in the LULUCF sector. Slovakia has supported the ambition of the EU to stand up more clearly with its “red lines” after the texts of the AWG LCA and AWG KP chairmen were distributed.
斯洛伐克

据来自燃料燃烧释放的二氧化碳排放量上的报告从国际能源机构，斯洛伐克已印制在2007年的36.8吨二氧化碳百万美元。温室气体的最重要的是来自斯洛伐克的数额焚烧和（75 - 80％）的化石燃料转化。当涉及到利用可再生能源的问题，斯洛伐克将其设置在6至2010年能源消费总量％的目标。生物燃料应占5,57％，直到2010年。 2007年，可再生能源的代表在3,5对斯洛伐克共和国的一次能源消费总量％。水电能源是可再生能源，对能源总消费的很大比重的唯一来源。

民意
在对有关气候变化问题的态度是斯洛伐克公民类似在整个欧洲联盟国家。根据关于对气候变化，41％的斯洛伐克公民，欧洲的态度向欧洲晴雨表认为气候变化是最严重的世界目前面临的问题。当被问及如何严重，气候变化问题是在目前，66％的斯洛伐克人认为，这是非常严重，76％的受访者不相信，这个问题被夸大了。当涉及到指责谁做得不够，以应对气候变化，59％归咎于国民政府。然而，当问多少，他们会愿意付出能源，减少温室气体排放24％的人会不会愿意这样做的一切，28％将支付1 - 5％以上，3 0％不知道。

斯洛伐克的排放量交易丑闻
斯洛伐克在2009年经历有关排放交易的丑闻。不仅斯洛伐克出售下的平均销售价的价格深的排放量在该行业的时间，而且该公司的真实存在InterBlue斯洛伐克哪个集团出售了其排放的质疑。根据现有数据，斯洛伐克损失了大约75密耳。欧元出售根据与InterBlue签订合同的条件，它的排放量。整个案件深入调查斯洛伐克记者，并导致严重的结果。调查结果还导致了环境和消除两个意见和总理和其他负责任的政治家争论不断变化的部长。起初，他们谴责了整个案件。

目前InterBlue集团仍然应该支付斯洛伐克1500万欧元，但该公司没有任何接触的人，合同无效了。

斯洛伐克在COP15会议在哥本哈根
在哥本哈根首脑会议上的气候变化2009年12月在斯洛伐克的立场是与相应的欧洲联盟的官方立场。斯洛伐克作为欧盟的一部分的情况下提供了一个30％的削减目标，其他发达国家和发展中国家也将参加在全球削减适当的水平。如果其他国家将不会愿意参加旨在减少排放量，斯洛伐克已在20％的目标，直到2020年，比1990年水平。关于为发展中国家在对付所谓的“快速启动融资”气候变化对斯洛伐克经济援助的问题，斯洛伐克将有助于900万欧元。

斯洛伐克的一个重要的优先任务是实现在哥本哈根谈判期间，这将保证环境的完整性，公平性和机会，以实现对二氧化碳的全球目标具有法律约束力的结果。据海伦娜普林佐娃，一个在哥本哈根的斯洛伐克代表团和一个联络人的气候变化框架公约（联合国气候变化框架公约更改）在气候变化和与环境部在对排放配额贸易部工作成员，this是唯一可能由目前连接个人谈判：“长期合作行动”（LCA）的和京都议定书（京都议定书），而金伯利进程的关键因素，应予以保留。

斯洛伐克还支持金融架构，将包括通知和核实，以实现为（适合本国的缓解 - 适合本国的缓解措施）reducing变化了的气候变化的影响aimed支持国家行动更accurate规则的具体建议。此外斯洛伐克支持在现有的改革和引进新的应对气候变化，例如土地使用，土地使用的变化和林业（LULUCF）部门，也是京都排放权限（分配数量单位的盈余管理方法灵活的机制，旨在倡议 - 分配量单位）。

在与斯洛伐克的国家利益，气候变化在哥本哈根首脑会议的代表密切监测和对下列问题的讨论参与，达成了关于成果的最终决定特设工作组（AWG）对京都议定书，其中提出了其对气候变化框架公约议定书的提案一的长期合作行动特设工作组的议定书和修正案。

最后的决定应该导致会议通常定目标的目标。斯洛伐克还高度建立一个机制，将资助气候变化的政治，举措和2012年修改后的支持。会议的另一个目标和实现目标是使进入下一个时期的未使用的具有约束力的京都排放权限移交的举动。为使土地利用秩序运作良好，斯洛伐克代表在创造一个分配在土地利用部门的排放量和捕捉方法的青睐。斯洛伐克支持欧盟的雄心，站起来与它的“红线后长期合作行动特设工作组和特设工作组主席案文京都议定书”更明确地被分配。

　　欧洲位于中纬度地区，西边是海。海岸线受海水作用的影响而形成锯齿状，而海洋是控制气候的主要原因。受海洋影响，欧洲气候温和、降雨丰富，相对湿度高并且多云，这一现象包括阿尔卑斯山北方的内陆地区。欧洲大陆东边降雨量则少，相对湿度低，天空晴朗，这一气候现象广及欧亚交接的的广大山麓地区。这些影响沿着南北程带状分布，并且穿过挪威、 丹麦与德国。阿尔卑斯山南面山区移动性的季节以亚热带高压系统为主，因此此地区的雨量，随着季节而有显著的不同，冬季多雨，夏季则干旱。
　　夏季最高温是在地中海区。雅典7月的平均气温是27℃，西班牙格拉纳达为25℃，而意大利的都灵为23.5℃。夏季平均温度向北方及沿海地区逐渐下降，挪威的特浪索和瓦尔多7月平均气温约为11℃和9℃。冬季时，温度由欧陆西南向东北逐渐下降；因此葡萄牙里斯本一月平均气温为10.5℃，前苏联的阿干折同月平均气温却是-14.5℃，大西洋沿岸冬天的平均气温颇高，例如挪威境内的北极圈沿岸冬季并不比纽约市冷。降雨量多集中在大西洋与地中海沿岸地区，而西北海岸的岛屿降雨量也不少，例如不列颠群岛。西北岸的降雨量多超过2000毫米，降雨量逐渐往东南方的黑海递减。

http://www.visegrad.info/climate-change-and-green-economy/factsheet/the-issues-of-carbon-dioxide-and-climate-change.htm

SLOVAKIA

According to the report on CO2 emissions from fuel combustion from the International energy agency, Slovakia has produced 36,8 millions of tons of CO2 in 2007. The most significant amount of greenhouse gases in Slovakia comes from burning and transformation of fossil fuels (75 - 80 %). When it comes to the question of using energy from renewable sources, Slovakia has set it target at 6% of the total energy consumption until 2010. Biofuels should account for 5,57 % until 2010. In 2007 the energy from renewable sources represented 3,5 % of the total consumption of primary energy in Slovak republic. Hydro energy is the only source of renewable energy which has a significant share on the total energy consumption.

Public opinion
The attitude of Slovak citizens towards questions related to climate change is similar to those in the whole European Union. According to the Eurobarometer on European attitudes towards climate change, 41 % of Slovak citizens think that climate change is the most serious problem facing the world currently. When asked how serious the issue of climate change is at the moment, 66% of Slovaks believe that it is very serious and 76 % of the respondents do not believe that the issue has been exaggerated. When it comes to blaming who is not doing enough to fight climate change, 59 % blame the national government. However, when asked how much more would they be prepared to pay for energy which emits less greenhouse gases 24% would not be willing to do so at all, 28% would pay 1 - 5 % more and 3 0% do not know.

Slovakia's emissions trading scandal
During 2009 Slovakia experienced a scandal related to emission trading. Not only did Slovakia sell its emissions at a price deep under the average selling price at the time of the trade, but also the real existence of the company InterBlue Group to which Slovakia sold its emissions is questioned. According to available data, Slovakia lost approximately 75 mil. eur by selling its emissions under the conditions of the contract signed with InterBlue. The whole case was intensively investigated by Slovak journalists and lead to serious findings. The findings also led to removing two ministers of environment and constant change of opinions and arguments of the prime minister and other responsible politicians. At first, they have denounced the whole case.

Currently InterBlue Group should still pay Slovakia EUR 15 million, but the company has no contact person and the contract is not valid anymore.

Slovakia at COP15 in Copenhagen
The Slovak position at the the Copenhagen Summit on climate change in December 2009 was corresponding with the official position of the European Union. Slovakia as part of the EU has offered a reduction target of 30% in case that other developed and developing countries will also participate at an appropriate level in the global reduction. If the other countries will not be willing to participate at reducing the emissions, Slovakia has set its target at 20% until 2020, compared to the level in 1990. Concerning the question of the financial assistance of Slovakia for developing countries to counter the climate changes in the so called “fast start financing”, Slovakia will contribute with 9 million euro.

A key priority for Slovakia was to achieve a legally binding outcome during the negotiations in Copenhagen, which would guarantee environmental integrity, fairness and a chance to achieve a global target on CO2. According to Helena Princová, a member of the Slovak delegation in Copenhagen and a contact person for UNFCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) working at the section on climate change and trading with emission quotas at the Ministry of environment, this is only possible by connecting at the moment individual negotiations: “Long- term Cooperative Action” (LCA) and Kyoto Protocol (KP), whereas key elements of the KP should be preserved.

Slovakia also supported specific proposals for a financial architecture which would include more accurate rules for informing and verifying, in order to achieve support for national initiatives (NAMAs - Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Measures) aimed at reducing the effects of the changed climate. Furthermore Slovakia supported the initiative aimed at reforming the already existing and introduce new flexible mechanisms countering climate change for example methodology for land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) sector and also management of the surplus of Kyoto emission permissions (AAUs – Assigned Amount Units).

In line with the national interests of Slovakia, the representatives at the Copenhagen Summit on Climate change were closely monitoring and participating at discussions on the following issues; reaching a final decision on the outcomes of the Ad Hoc Working Group (AWG) on the Kyoto Protocol, which has proposed an amendment of the Protocol and the AWG LCA with its proposal of a protocol for UNFCCC.

The final decision should lead to meeting the generally set target goals. Slovakia was also highly supportive of creating a mechanism which would finance the climate change politics, initiatives and adaptations after the year 2012. Another move towards meeting the targets and goals would be to enable the transfer of unused Kyoto emission permissions into the next binding periods. In order for the LULUCF to function well, the Slovak representatives were in favor of creating a methodology for assigning emissions and captures in the LULUCF sector. Slovakia has supported the ambition of the EU to stand up more clearly with its “red lines” after the texts of the AWG LCA and AWG KP chairmen were distributed.
斯洛伐克

据来自燃料燃烧释放的二氧化碳排放量上的报告从国际能源机构，斯洛伐克已印制在2007年的36.8吨二氧化碳百万美元。温室气体的最重要的是来自斯洛伐克的数额焚烧和（75 - 80％）的化石燃料转化。当涉及到利用可再生能源的问题，斯洛伐克将其设置在6至2010年能源消费总量％的目标。生物燃料应占5,57％，直到2010年。 2007年，可再生能源的代表在3,5对斯洛伐克共和国的一次能源消费总量％。水电能源是可再生能源，对能源总消费的很大比重的唯一来源。

民意
在对有关气候变化问题的态度是斯洛伐克公民类似在整个欧洲联盟国家。根据关于对气候变化，41％的斯洛伐克公民，欧洲的态度向欧洲晴雨表认为气候变化是最严重的世界目前面临的问题。当被问及如何严重，气候变化问题是在目前，66％的斯洛伐克人认为，这是非常严重，76％的受访者不相信，这个问题被夸大了。当涉及到指责谁做得不够，以应对气候变化，59％归咎于国民政府。然而，当问多少，他们会愿意付出能源，减少温室气体排放24％的人会不会愿意这样做的一切，28％将支付1 - 5％以上，3 0％不知道。

斯洛伐克的排放量交易丑闻
斯洛伐克在2009年经历有关排放交易的丑闻。不仅斯洛伐克出售下的平均销售价的价格深的排放量在该行业的时间，而且该公司的真实存在InterBlue斯洛伐克哪个集团出售了其排放的质疑。根据现有数据，斯洛伐克损失了大约75密耳。欧元出售根据与InterBlue签订合同的条件，它的排放量。整个案件深入调查斯洛伐克记者，并导致严重的结果。调查结果还导致了环境和消除两个意见和总理和其他负责任的政治家争论不断变化的部长。起初，他们谴责了整个案件。

目前InterBlue集团仍然应该支付斯洛伐克1500万欧元，但该公司没有任何接触的人，合同无效了。

斯洛伐克在COP15会议在哥本哈根
在哥本哈根首脑会议上的气候变化2009年12月在斯洛伐克的立场是与相应的欧洲联盟的官方立场。斯洛伐克作为欧盟的一部分的情况下提供了一个30％的削减目标，其他发达国家和发展中国家也将参加在全球削减适当的水平。如果其他国家将不会愿意参加旨在减少排放量，斯洛伐克已在20％的目标，直到2020年，比1990年水平。关于为发展中国家在对付所谓的“快速启动融资”气候变化对斯洛伐克经济援助的问题，斯洛伐克将有助于900万欧元。

斯洛伐克的一个重要的优先任务是实现在哥本哈根谈判期间，这将保证环境的完整性，公平性和机会，以实现对二氧化碳的全球目标具有法律约束力的结果。据海伦娜普林佐娃，一个在哥本哈根的斯洛伐克代表团和一个联络人的气候变化框架公约（联合国气候变化框架公约更改）在气候变化和与环境部在对排放配额贸易部工作成员，this是唯一可能由目前连接个人谈判：“长期合作行动”（LCA）的和京都议定书（京都议定书），而金伯利进程的关键因素，应予以保留。

斯洛伐克还支持金融架构，将包括通知和核实，以实现为（适合本国的缓解 - 适合本国的缓解措施）reducing变化了的气候变化的影响aimed支持国家行动更accurate规则的具体建议。此外斯洛伐克支持在现有的改革和引进新的应对气候变化，例如土地使用，土地使用的变化和林业（LULUCF）部门，也是京都排放权限（分配数量单位的盈余管理方法灵活的机制，旨在倡议 - 分配量单位）。

在与斯洛伐克的国家利益，气候变化在哥本哈根首脑会议的代表密切监测和对下列问题的讨论参与，达成了关于成果的最终决定特设工作组（AWG）对京都议定书，其中提出了其对气候变化框架公约议定书的提案一的长期合作行动特设工作组的议定书和修正案。

最后的决定应该导致会议通常定目标的目标。斯洛伐克还高度建立一个机制，将资助气候变化的政治，举措和2012年修改后的支持。会议的另一个目标和实现目标是使进入下一个时期的未使用的具有约束力的京都排放权限移交的举动。为使土地利用秩序运作良好，斯洛伐克代表在创造一个分配在土地利用部门的排放量和捕捉方法的青睐。斯洛伐克支持欧盟的雄心，站起来与它的“红线后长期合作行动特设工作组和特设工作组主席案文京都议定书”更明确地被分配。

驻斯洛伐克大使陈建福就气候变化问题接受斯国家通讯社专访

2009年12月15日，陈建福大使就气候变化问题和哥本哈根峰会接受斯洛伐克国家通讯社独家专访，就温室气体减排目标和哥本哈根会议、对发展中国家资金和技术援助、中国发展可再生能源、中斯植树造林合作等问题回答了记者的提问。

陈大使强调，中国政府高度重视气候变化问题，并以实际行动积极推动哥本哈根会议取得成果。不久前刚刚公布的一系列行动目标体现了中国政府可以做出的最大努力，也体现了中国对全人类的未来高度负责的态度。陈指出，哥本哈根会议文件必须坚持《联合国气候变化框架公约》及《京都议定书》规定的原则，坚持“巴厘路线图”，坚持“共同但有区别的责任”，中国作为负责任的发展中国家，愿与世界各国通力合作，积极开展对话，共同应对人类面临的这一最大挑战。

你给我一个邮箱我发给你。

---

繁峙县19723436070： 斯洛伐克的气候状况如何? ？
阳面间苯： 斯洛伐克地处欧洲温带气候最优越的气 候区,属海洋性气候向大陆性气候过渡的温 带阔叶林气候,既无严寒又无酷暑,四季变 化不大,雨量相当充沛.年平均气温7〜9°C. 最冷的1月份,平均温度为0〜5°C;最热的 7月份,平均温度也只有15〜19°C.年平均降水量720毫米.

繁峙县19723436070： 斯洛伐克是一个怎样的国家 - ？
阳面间苯： 斯洛伐克地势北高南低,风景优美,气候宜人,历史文物景点多,旅游资源丰富.全国共有大小湖泊160多个.美丽的湖泊既是旅游观光景点又是发展淡水养鱼业和农业的重要基地. 斯洛伐克虽然是内陆国家,但其交通运输便利.全国拥有3600多公里的铁路,多瑙河在斯洛伐克境内长达172公里,可行驶1500—2000吨的驳船.驾船逆流而上可抵德国的雷根斯堡,顺流而下,可经罗马尼亚进入黑海. 斯洛伐克推行社会市场经济,主要工业部门有钢铁、食品、烟草加工、交通工具、石化、机械、汽车等.主要农作物有大麦、小麦、玉米、油料作物、马铃薯、甜菜等

繁峙县19723436070： 为什么越来越多的人移民斯洛伐克 - ？
阳面间苯： 原因一:地理方面的优势在国内很多的地区气温都是四季分明的,斯洛伐克也是有着分明的司机,年降水量达到800毫米,平均气温达到10摄氏度左右,由于其属于温带气候,就会有非常明显的四季交替,很适合人们的生活,较低温度达到零...

繁峙县19723436070： 德国为什么要捷克斯洛伐克 - ？
阳面间苯： 第一,从位置上说,捷克斯洛伐克位于欧洲的中心,与德国和奥地利接壤.非常具有战略意义,一旦捷克斯洛伐克对德国进攻,将直逼德国的腹部第二,从政治倾向性上说,捷克斯洛伐克受法国支持非常大,倾向法国,在未来战争中对德国有致命威胁第三,从经济角度出发,捷克也是当时世界十大工业国之一,军工行业非常发达,如果吞并捷克对德国而言很有利出于上述考虑,德国先是吞并了苏台德区,然后吞并了整个捷克

繁峙县19723436070： 11月初去匈牙利,捷克,奥地利,斯洛伐克,德国旅游,不知道气候如何? - ？
阳面间苯： 欧洲位于中纬度地区,西边是海.海岸线受海水作用的影响而形成锯齿状,而海洋是控制气候的主要原因.受海洋影响,欧洲气候温和、降雨丰富,相对湿度高并且多云,这一现象包括阿尔卑斯山北方的内陆地区.欧洲大陆东边降雨量则少,相...

繁峙县19723436070： 捷克斯洛伐克六月底的气候 - ？
阳面间苯： LZ您好 捷克斯洛伐克在六月底大约高温可有23度左右,低温15度左右的样子 由于属于温带海洋性气候向大陆性气候过度的地方,降水较少但是稳定,大约80mm全月,但需注意境内丘陵山地,西侧为迎风坡,降水多于东侧. 我国大部分东部地区6月气温都已经比这个水准炎热,也更为潮湿.所以LZ可把这个气候当作我国北方5月,有轻微春旱时的那种状态.

繁峙县19723436070： (12分)阅读材料,回答问题以下是美国和捷克斯洛伐克分别于1947年和1949年以马歇尔计划(Marshall Plan - ？
阳面间苯： 主题:图a:马歇尔计划旨在帮助欧洲复兴;图b:马歇尔计划旨在束缚和控制德法等西欧国家(4分)国际时局的因素:当时处于冷战时期,美国和捷克斯洛伐克分属资本主义阵营和社会主义阵营,处于敌视状态.(4分) 国家立场的因素:美国是...

繁峙县19723436070： 免费杀毒软件排名 - 好用的免费的杀毒软件及组合,推荐几个 ？
阳面间苯： 每个杀毒软件都有自己的特点. 一、卡巴就好象西毒,凶猛强悍,神功盖世,对敌决... 在捷克和斯洛伐克语中的意思是 “医院”,而一个反病毒程序在某种意义可以被理解...

繁峙县19723436070： 斯洛伐克是什么样的国家?为什么电影人皮客栈里面那个俱乐部要选在斯洛伐克呢?求解答 - ？
阳面间苯： 斯洛伐克是欧洲内陆国家,其现存的古堡是欧洲各国之最,跟很多欧洲内陆国家一样,斯洛伐克也有很多吸血鬼的传闻,就在一座座的古堡里,所以那边的感脚就是有点郁,也很黑暗(抽象啦). 如果说吸血鬼在斯洛伐克是不足为奇,但若是人皮客栈,貌似中亚比较多诶,难道是传到中欧啦?还是内陆国家的通病呢,封闭,历史悠久,传说众多. 这些是我的理解啦,希望对你有帮助.

繁峙县19723436070： 去斯洛伐克旅游的最佳时间 - ？
阳面间苯： 斯洛伐克是世界上著名的旅游文化圣地,所以一年四季都适合观光旅行.不过从气候考虑,建议旅客避免夏季和冬季前往,天气太热或是太冷,对旅行来说多少不便 位于欧洲中部的斯洛伐克,以山...