there was no lack of things for the father to worry about
此题是一个选择问句。
be culture smart or be science intelligent?是要文化所带来的聪慧，还是要科学带来的智能？culture用来强调smart的方式。be smart, be culture smart。同理 ，science是intelligent的方式，be intelligent, be science intelligent.
例文4篇，仅供参考---
1.
Good afternoon，ladies and gentlemen，distinguished guests and honorable judges:
I’m xxxfrom E810. It is my great honour to share my viewpoints on Culture Smart or Science Intelligent with you.
This question resemble Mother or Fanther, who do you like better. Most of us will chose mother, when we were young, we always song Mum Is The Best In The World told us.
Here I wnna make an analogy, Let’s likened Culture Smart to Mother, likened Science Intelligent to father.
Formerly, as is the nature’s call:we like mother for almost five thousand years, she gives us the most long-standing history of civilization in the world. It is no exaggeration to say that the culture of our country is the most brilliant in the world. as it turned out, we have a great distance between our father Science Intelligent.Therefore he give us only the four great inventions of ancient China, which included powder ,compass, papaermaking, and printing,moreover, we didn’t make full use of it,
On the contrary, our brother western countries are fond of father Science Intelligent obviously, Because father gives them many technology which helped them become developed country.
Meanwhile we are always proud of our culture,For example, our abundant cultural deposits which made our civilization like a shining star in the darkness. When people mentioned about the human civilization, we have to refer to our China, because Chinese culture is the most historical and brilliant culture in the world.
But, by the way our technology has get far behind the western countries.
Unfortunately,one day, They attacked us with our own invention powder .our father sent his sons western countries to give us a good beating, because if we fall behind,we will be punished by those who are one-up. we do nothing about it, because what we have is just culture,rather than defence of hign technology.
Evidently ,god is fair, God closed a door and will open another window for you.
Here I wanna share a story that my history teacher told me. Once upon a time, There was a couple, they had two children ,the elder brother liked reading, he could acquire much knowledge from books in his study ,the younger brother was a behaviourist, no matter what kinds of problems in front of him, he will take action to solve it, all he believed was that the practice is the sole criterion for testing truth. So he made a plan to travel around the world, Decades years past, they both became adults ,the elder brother had become a teacher at his hometown (at the local) ,He tought Confucian culture for many children. He imparted knowledge and culture to people, However, his younger brother came back home with many manual skills, for example he learned how to make gizmos, such as windmill which helped the local farmers in Irrigating crop fields, and the round wheels which made transportation more convenient and so on.
All right, Let's keep on track. Culture Smart or Science Intelligent like these two brothers, who is better? The answer is both are good, They are as close as two siblings, two brother can never be divided.
2.
Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen: thanks for raising your attention. It’s a pleasure for me to share my point of view of the topic with you all. Well ,the topic I’m going to deal with is “culture smart or science intelligent”.
When the topic first caught my eye , the great artist Leonardo Da Vinci occurred to me . As is known to all, Leonardo has a gift for the paining, so there are many famous painting works drawn by him which are really impressive ,such as the well-known portrait Mona Lisa, however , he is not only an artist ,but a great inventor and a scientist. Everything he saw , heard , or experienced was an opportunity to learn something new, in another word , everything fascinated him. Therefore , according to his notebook , we found many inventions that were full of imagination and some theories about optics , which did help Leonardo’s paintings to be more vivid. So , I believe that the culture and science can be compatible, rather than an alternative.
As far as I’m concerned , the intelligent one in science may be a clever one , while the smart one in culture might be wisdom. Someone once said , the elimination of culture leads to the disappearance of civilization, this proves that we need the guidance of culture smart . On one hand , the culture provides ideological power to science and technology , on the other hand , culture prevents the tendency of extremity of science and technology . Nevertheless, there’s no doubt that the science and technology take the supreme lead of the productivity. Without the advanced science and technology , no achievements or progress would be made .What the distinctive feature of science is its commitment to an open-ended exploration. Then , my conclusion is the science and culture are not antagonistic, instead , they’re the complement.
Life is a multiple-choice exam , so I believe the answer is not an only certain thing. I’d like to compare the science to the composition of a painting , while the culture to the color of the painting ; the science is just like the heart , and the culture is our mind. Culture motivate science , and science develop culture.
3.How often have we not been told that the study of physical science is incompetent to confer culture; that it touches none of the higher problems of life; and, what is worse, that the continual devotion to scientific studies tends to generate a narrow and bigoted belief in the applicability of scientific methods to the search after truth of all kinds ? How frequently one has reason to observe that no reply to a troublesome argument tells so well as calling its author a "mere scientific specialist." And, as I am afraid it is not permissible to speak of this form of opposition to scientific education in the past tense; may we not expect to be told that this, not only omission, but prohibition, of "mere literary instruction and education" is a patent example of scientific narrow-mindedness?
I think that we must all assent to the first proposition. For culture certainly means something quite different from learning or technical skill. It implies the possession of an ideal, and the habit of critically estimating the value of things by comparison with a theoretic standard. Perfect culture should supply a complete theory of life, based upon a clear knowledge alike of its possibilities and of its limitations.
What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture
What Science Offers the Humanities examines some of the deep problems facing current approaches to the study of culture. It focuses especially on the excesses of postmodernism, but also acknowledges serious problems with postmodernism's harshest critics. In short, in order for the humanities to progress, its scholars need to take seriously contributions from the natural sciences-and particular research on human cognition-which demonstrate that any separation of the mind and the body is entirely untenable. The author provides suggestions for how humanists might begin to utilize these scientific discoveries without conceding that science has the last word on morality, religion, art, and literature. Calling into question such deeply entrenched dogmas as the "blank slate" theory of nature, strong social constructivism, and the ideal of disembodied reason, What Science Offers the Humanities replaces the human-sciences divide with a more integrated approach to the study of culture.
Technology and Culture have both influenced each other equally. Technology has been directed as an improvement in our lives, but on the other hand, Culture has been present in every invention, noticeable or not, and advancement in our evolving society. Technology is becoming focused upon more and more everyday, but culture is the determining factor that decides if there is a necessity for an improvement. There are endless views and perspectives that this situation can be viewed from, but without a doubt, Technology and Culture shape one another. Culture has been a part of our society, and way of life, forever. It is almost impossible to come up with an idea that isnt influenced by culture. Picture our lives without cars, television, and computers. This would be an example of everyday life without technology. People could function happily in that type of atmosphere, but technology has changed our lives forever. Technology has changed our pace and perspective on education. Students would have to go to libraries and spend a lot of time researching to find out information for class assignments, but with technology students can find almost anything on there home computers and by accessing the internet. Technology has definitely become the authoritative factor in our lives, but culture has shaped technology. Technology is made and used in such a variety of ways because many people who use the technology of today come from all walks of life and have different necessities, so to compensate for that technology must adapt to all different cultures.
4.
Culture Smart or Science Intelligent
Good evening，ladies and gentlemen，distinguished guests and honorable judges:
It is my great honour to share my viewpoints on Culture Smart and Science Intelligence with all of dear audience present.
As is known to us all that our contemporary lives and the society in current are undergoing profound changes with the promoting development of science and technology. However, have we realized the estrange and departure of our culture against the background on which the positive achievements have been brought by science and technology. Which course should we take in culture smart and science intelligence as the issue on social development is concerned in the process of ultrahigh-speeded urbanization? My viewpoint is clear an firm, that is the cultue smart.
It is generally accepted by the broad mass that science and technology take the supreme lead of the productivity. No achievements nurtured by civilization in our contemporary society can be created without the development of science and technology and the society will fall to its stagnant pace. Thanks to the progress made by the advancing science and technology, especially the development of intelligentization, schemed out by robots, unmanned driving and digital platform, offers great convienience to both the production and daily lives of human beings and promotes the social progress.
But under no circumstances should we admit that a series of problems on environment and social ethics concerning environment pollution, ozonocavity, greenhouse effect, colon human and nuclear deterrent occurred against the prosperity carried out by science and technology. So how can we spare no effort on keeping such problems from deterioration in all possibilities? What development pattern will be on science and technology in future?
The answer is that we need the guidance of culture smart. When we talk about culture, we may regard it as the tradition and history, but how can the intelligentization of science and technology be guided by the culture smart? Here I want to put it that culture is not like a pond filled with stagnant water, but a dynamic system. We can never draw a conclusion of culture as “the deposit of history”, what’s more, we should make it clear that the culture defines our present and future. Modernization, of any kind or shape, shares no alteration on its starting point but the commencement of culture. If not the modernization will inevitably fall to the situation where the water has no source and the tree has no root. The development of science and technology takes no exception on this.
The ultrahigh speed of the development of contemporary science and technology contributes no efforts on science and technology itself, but the ideological motivation and the promotion spurred by the ideological power offerd by culture smart. Karl Poopper once said, the elimination of culture leads to the disappearance of civilization. It is obviously that if the promotion effect had been omitted, the science and technology could have been far-reached.
The culture smart guides our society into stability and prosperity. We need culture smart because on the one hand, culture provides ideological power to science and technology, on the other hand, culture prevents the tendency of extremity of science and technology. The current problem concerning colon human, outerspace utilitization and nuclear weapon byproducted by contemporary science and technology call for the development in a just course on the sphere of culture. The wisdom-vacanted culture and the extremized science and technology will throw a great threat to the survival of us human beings and the world peace.
So, ladies and gentlemen, I think that the culture wisdom is our “root” and we need the root that supports our belief, the negation of the root casts its reflections on history and the existence of us human beings. So only in the manner of settling on the basis of culture smart can we make it helpful to the development of science and technology in a just course, the continual progress of human society, the prosperity and peace.
Thank you!
Both science itself, and the human culture of which it is a part, would benefit from a story of science that encourages wider engagement with and participation in the processes of scientific exploration. Such a story, based on a close analysis of scientific method, is presented here. It is the story of science as story telling and story revising. The story of science as story suggests that science can and should serve three distinctive functions for humanity: providing stories that may increase (but never guarantee) human well-being, serving as a supportive nexus for human exploration and story telling in general, and exemplifying a commitment to skepticism and a resulting open-ended and continuing exploration of what might yet be. Some practical considerations that would further the development and acceptance of such a story of science as a widely shared nexus of human activity are described.
Culture Smart or Science Intelligent?
Science and Culture
What is science? How does it relate to our lives as individual human beings? to other aspects of our social and cultural communities?
What is our future? ...our own role in and responsibility for the future? Can empirical inquiry help with such questions?
How does empirical understanding relate to other kinds of understanding? Are they necessarily antagonistic or can they usefully complement one another?
Division and specialization of function – science school and culture school
The intention is to retain traditional methods of teaching science, but to adjust the quantity of this kind of rigorous education to the abilities and attitudes of the student. This implies that it would be more educationally efficient for weaker students to spend just one or two hours per day learning science in a rigorous and ‘didactic’ classroom situation than to spend much longer in less-structured forms of classroom experience. At least, it is known from extensive experience (with elite students) that traditional methods are an effective and efficient way of teaching science.
A general understanding of efficiency in systems suggests some principles which would be likely to lead to greater science education efficiency. Perhaps the most frequent way in which human (and biological) systems are able to increase their efficiency is the principle of ‘division of labour’ which was first articulated by the economist Adam Smith. Division of labour increases the complexity of organization by specialization of function, and coordination of these specialized functions. Smith’s famous example involved a pin factory, in which the procedure for making a pin was broken down into numerous simpler, more-specialized sequential steps; and these steps were coordinated by managers leading to vastly increased efficiency (as measured by the numbers of pins produced per person per day) [8].
When the modern school is examined in this light, it can be seen that there is already considerable specialization. For example teachers are specialized according to age of children taught, subject matter expertise, and administrative responsibilities. Schools are also internally specialized by age stratification and academic aptitude of students (also, sometimes, by the sex or socio-economic class of students). However, logically there is a further possible division of function. My proposal is that the efficiency of science teaching might be increased by introducing a functional division between science education, and what might be termed cultural education - which would include arts, sports, ethics, social aspects of schooling and any other educational objectives such as good citizenship.
Schools might have an internal functional division into ‘science school’ and ‘culture school’. This functional division should be reflected in terms of physical plant, separate administrative structures, and the recruitment of differently-specialized teaching personnel. These divisions would be characterized by the nature of their system-characteristic internal evaluations. For instance, the evaluations within science school would be relatively narrow and more examination-focused than in the culture school. In science school the performance of both teaching staff and students would be judged mainly (although not exclusively) by scientific criteria, including formal examination results. Science school would be distinguished by its academic ethos and scholarly expectations. The focus of science school would be to inculcate the aptitude for abstract systematic cognition.
For example, an existing school might become physically divided between science and cultural parts, each on distinct parts of the campus. Each student would spend some significant part of each day (depending on their aptitude and motivation) in the ‘science school’, experiencing a traditional-style, didactic, disciplined and rigorous academic education which is (so far as we can tell) the best way to teach real science at the basic level. Science school teaching would need to be stratified according to ability and aptitude, since this is more efficient than teaching widely-mixed classes. Different strata of students could be taught from a broadly common curriculum (enabling educational credit accumulation and transfer); but different abilities of student would cover different amounts of subject matter, different specific subjects, and progress at different speeds.
The remainder of the students’ time at school would be spent in the cultural division, which would focus on broader aspects, and aiming to generate a more rounded and social individual. Examinations in culture school would be much more based on participation, sustained effort, attitudes, attendance etc. Inevitably, since it has many aims and a wider focus, culture school would apply many evaluations to its teachers and students. Inevitably, too, these evaluations would be less clear-cut and more contested.
我很喜欢你写的，我会尽全力翻译完
你相信我，我在国外念书不需要翻译器，不过语法方面请你看一下！^^
看完了我也学到了很多。。。
今天是公元2009年，一直都想写一个关于自己的故事，但却不知从何说起。也许是要说的太多太多。
Today is 2009 A.D, I have always wanted to write a story about myself, but I don’t even know where to start. Perhaps there is just too much to say.
当时光匆匆流逝，我们不在年轻的时候。惘然回首才回忆起了很多往事.........
When time starts passing by us quicker than ever, when we are no longer young, looking up I suddenly remembered many things about the past.
爱情,是生命中无法远离的主题.每个人都希望有一份感情,它真真切切地只属于我们自己.或许是浪漫的,或许是感伤的,或许是平淡的......就如鱼儿离不开水。
Love, is the one thing live is nothing without. Everyone hope to have they kind of feeling, and it really only belongs to ourselves, maybe it was romantic, maybe it was sad, or maybe it was just plain……just like a fish is nothing without water.
人,离得开爱情吗? 失去后才珍惜,还有什么意义,还是有人不肯去忘记,忘不了那一段回忆。
People, can they really leave love behind? Only after it’s gone will people start cherishing it, then what meaning is there, or are there people unwilling to forget, forget that particular piece of memory.
刹那间,开始怀疑,自已的命运像一场电影,不断的重复上映,抓不住的情绪逃不了的陷阱,凌乱的心情,这样纠缠下去,该怎么去抚平。
At that moment, I start doubting myself, my life is like a movie, it kept playing and playing before me, the intangible feeling and inescapable trap, those messy strands of feeling, how do I sort out this sort of entanglement?
爱总是在离别之前,让每个人能看清一点,犯下的错,该如何放下,该如何放手,再怎么去挽回,一道裂痕隐隐约约的掠过........
Love always shows everyone its true side before its departure, letting each person know the mistakes they made, and how to let go, how to make up, all the pieces of scars vaguely passing by…
2002年夏日，学生时代永远是最美好的时光。我们跟其他恋人一样，在老套的剧情下相恋了。她给了我很多帮助。
The summer of 2002, many fond memories of student life. We are just like the other lovers, falling in love like in those cliché movies. She gave me a lot of help.
一天中最希望的事情就是能在睁开眼睛的时候就见到她。她给了我太多的第一次。。。。她叫于哲！
The one thing I look forward to the most is opening my eyes and seeing her. She has been my firsts, for a lot of things…her name was Yu Zhe!
2004年夏日，一个女孩不知不觉的就爱上我了。她并没有很漂亮的外表，但有着善良般的心灵。
The summer of 2004, a girls somehow fell in love with me. She was no beauty to the eye, but she was a kind hearted soul.
她不张狂，很稳重。她不求回报，只是一味的付出又付出。如果非让我选择个恋爱结婚的人。我想我无疑的会选择她。她叫葛清。
She was not impudent, but a very sedated person, she is a constant giver. If I were ever given the choice to choose someone to fall in love and marry, doubtlessly it would be her, her name was Ge Qing.
2006年4月15日，晴。这一天我遇见了至今为止我最爱的女孩，那一夜我没有回家。
April 15th, 2006 Weather: Sunny. Today I met a girl that even till today, I’m still in lover with, that night I did not return home.
我不知道该怎么去形容她。她有点坏，有点清秀，还有点小文学。她喜欢大清早起床就开启电视机看《百家讲坛》，她喜欢洗澡的时候不打沐浴露，她喜欢吃我做的炒苦瓜（即使做的很难吃），她喜欢把衣服折叠的像专卖店那样整齐。她叫谷小牧！
I don’t know how to describe her. She is a bit bad, yet a bit refreshing and pretty, a bit literate too. She likes to wakeup early in the morning and turn on the TV to watch百家讲坛(怎么翻译你自己看吧)， she doesn’t like to put on shower lotion when she takes a shower, she likes to eat the stir fried bitter melon I made (it actually tastes really bad), she likes to fold clothes like those ones on display in stores, her name was Gu Xiao Mu.
2007年2月14日，大雪。故事总是那么戏剧化的在不断进行着，一个网络聊天室引发了一段恋情。
February 14th, 2007 Weather: Heavy snow. The story always keeps on going in such dramatic ways, an online chatting room started my next relationship
在还没有放下上一段感情的前提下，其实我们是不应该开始新的一段恋情的。而我却伤害了她。
But this was before I could put behind my feelings from my previous relationship, we actually shouldn’t have started this in the first place. But I did hurt her.
我一直不敢承认对她的伤害，那是因为我自私。她有点可爱，有点聪明，还有一些经历。我喜欢她吻我的唇，我喜欢她大半夜偷跑出来就为见我一面，我喜欢她坐在电脑前关注屏幕可爱的样子，她也是我今生第一个送花女孩。她叫赵枫桐！
I never could admit the hurt I brought upon her, it was because I was selfish. She is a bit cute and a bit smart, and has had some experience before. I like the feeling of her lips on mine, I like her sneaking out at night just to see me, I like that adorable look she has when she is sitting in front of the computer focusing on the screen. She was the first girl I gave flowers to, her name was Zhao Feng Tong.
2008年9月，晴。人生总是那么无常，明天要发生什么事情你永远不会知道，她就这样的闯入了我的生活。
September, 2008 Weather: sunny. Life is always so unpredictable, you will never know what’s going to happen to you tomorrow, and just like that, she came into my life.
她很男人性格，豪爽，大方，善良，勤劳，贤惠。甚至在某些事情上我到成了女人。她什么都不会做，但依然过的很快乐。
Her personality is quite masculine, she’s bold, generous, kind-hearted, hard-working, virtuous. Even making me the woman in some cases. She doesn’t know how to do anything, but we were still very happy.
我想，可能她才找到了人生的真谛。跟她在一起的时候感觉很踏实。但她对我而言，只适合做朋友，却不是情侣。她叫奕萍！
I think she may have found the true meaning of life. I feel so steady when I’m with her. But to me, she is only fit to be a friend, not a lover. Her name was Yi Ping.
关于友情常听人说，人世间最纯净的友情只存在于孩童时代。
One of the most often heard sayings about friendship is that friendship in its purest form can only be found in childhood.
这是一句极其悲凉的话，居然有那么多人赞成，人生之孤独和艰难，可想而知。
Such a sad and dreary thing to say, yet so many people agree to it, you can imagine the hardships and loneliness in life.
我并不赞成这句话。孩童时代的友情只是愉快的嘻戏，成年人靠着回忆追加给它的东西很不真实。
I don’t quite agree with this saying. The friendship in childhood were merely happy giggles and play, it is unreal for adults to relay on things formed through past memories.
友情的真正意义产生于成年之后，它不可能在尚未获得意义之时便抵达最佳状态。
The real meaning of friendship forms years later in adulthood, it can not reach it’s best when the meaning of it is still unclear.
其实，很多人都是在某次友情感受的突变中，猛然发现自己长大的。
Accutallly, many people find themselves quickly growing up after a sudden emotional change.
仿佛是哪一天的中午或傍晚，一位要好同学遇到的困难使你感到了一种不可推卸的责任，你放慢脚步忧思起来，开始懂得人生的重量。
It’s like some day, afternoon or night, a good friend of yours is in trouble and you feel this undeniable responsibility, you slow your steps to think, and start to understand the weight of life.
就在这一刻，你突然长大。 印象中有几个一辈子的朋友足够了，至于其他人对我来说根本不是很重要。关于亲情，在我来说以前和现在都是一样的，从来没有改变过。
And at that moment you suddenly grew up. Looking back, only a few lifelong friends are needed, the others are of no importance to me. When it comes to family, it is the same to me as before, it never changed.
也是唯一能让我欣慰的情感。人生一世，亲情、友情、爱情三者缺一，已为遗憾；三者缺二，实为可怜；三者皆缺 ，活而如亡。
And this is the only sort of emotional comfort I can get. One life time, family friendship, love, even if you lack just one, you will surely regret, if you lack two, then it is pitiful, if you lack all three, then your life would equal death.
也可以读作：There is no lack of things for the father to worry about
there
英 [ðeə(r)] 美 [ðer]
adv.
那里;在那里;在那一点上
pron.
表示某物或某人的存在或某事的发生（常用作be, seem或appear的主语）
int.
（表示满足、烦恼）你瞧，好啦，得啦
lack
英 [læk] 美 [læk]
vt.
缺乏，缺少;需要的东西
n.
缺乏，不足，没有;缺少的东西
第三人称单数： lacks 复数： lacks 现在分词： lacking 过去式： lacked 过去分词： lacked
things
英 [θɪŋz] 美 [θɪŋz]
n.
（个人的）用品;需要的东西;生物;事实;物（ thing的名词复数 ）
father
英 [ˈfɑ:ðə(r)] 美 [ˈfɑðɚ]
n.
父亲;天父;祖先;（尤指天主教和东正教的）神父
vt.
成为父亲;创立（新思想）;创造;发明（新方法）
第三人称单数： fathers 复数： fathers 现在分词： fathering 过去式： fathered 过去分词： fathered
worry about
英 [ˈwʌri əˈbaut] 美 [ˈwɚri əˈbaʊt]
词典
担忧， 烦恼;惦念;挂虑
并没缺少可以让爸爸所担心的东西
并没缺少东西可以让爸爸所担心的
没有什么大事值得这个父亲去担忧
禄佩明齐： lack n.可数,缺乏 lack of sth (物质上的,具体的) a lack of sth a lack of money 缺乏资金 There was no lack of wolunteers. 志愿者不乏其人. lack vt. 缺乏,不足,短缺 lack sth He lacks confidence. 他缺乏信心. lacking adj 缺乏的 be lacking in (某一方面,抽象的) She's not usually lacking in confidence. 她平时并不缺乏信心.
颍州区15559701032： lack 的用法? - ？
禄佩明齐： 看例子: 1. She lacks confidence.她没有信心. (lack作及物动词,用于肯定句中.) 2. She doesn't lack for confidence. 她不缺乏信心.(lack作不及物动词,用于否定句中.) 3. She didn't attend the party for lack of confidence.她没有参加这个聚会,因为她没有信心.(lack作名词,与of搭配使用.注意:名词lack绝对不能与for连用.) 4. She is lacking in confidence. 她没有信心.(lacking作形容词用,前面有系动词,后面与in搭配使用.)
颍州区15559701032： lack of 后面加名词单数还是复数?? - ？
禄佩明齐： 以不可数名词多见,但否定有复数的. The item was not explained for lack of time . 此项因时间不足而没被说明.Lack of funding is making our job more difficult. 资金短缺使我们的工作更加困难. There was no lack of hands. 人手并不缺
颍州区15559701032： be lacking sth 和be lack in sth的区别? - ？
禄佩明齐： lack用法 (1).lack 动词,意思是“缺乏;不足;没有”.作及物动词用.例如:He lacks courage.他缺乏勇气.Owing to lack of time, we cannot do more than what we have done.由于时间不够,我们只能做到这样.Their actions lack ...
颍州区15559701032： lack of 后面加名词单数还是复数? - ？
禄佩明齐：[答案] 以不可数名词多见,但否定有复数的.The item was not explained for lack of time .此项因时间不足而没被说明.Lack of funding is making our job more difficult.资金短缺使我们的工作更加困难.There was no lack of...
颍州区15559701032： there was no lack of things for the father to worry about - ？
禄佩明齐： 中文意思是:有没有缺乏的东西为父亲担心 也可以读作:There is no lack of things for the father to worry about there 英 [ðeə(r)] 美 [ðer] adv.那里;在那里;在那一点上 pron.表示某物或某人的存在或某事的发生(常用作be, seem或appear的主...
颍州区15559701032： 什么时候用there, 什么时候用 it? - ？
禄佩明齐： there is/are 代表“有...”的意思,相对来说it的用途比较广些. 比如:there is an envelope (on the desk). (桌上)有个信封 it is an envelope. 这是个信封
颍州区15559701032： 有没有“be lack of”这种用法?试举一例, - ？
禄佩明齐：[答案] yes There is no lack of vegetable. 蔬菜不缺. The lack of rain aggravated the serious lack of food. ＂由于干旱少雨,缺粮问题更加严重.＂ It was lack of current capital that defeated their business. ＂因为缺少流动资本,他们的企业才告失败.＂ Serious ...
颍州区15559701032： 关于词语lack的用法 - ？
禄佩明齐： Lack n.没有,不足,缺乏(通常在其后+of) Lack of vitamin B can produce a variety of symptoms.缺少维生素B会引发多种症状. for/through lack of=because there is a lack of 因缺乏…… not lack of 不缺少 There was no lack of willing helpers.不乏...
颍州区15559701032： 有关there be的知识点 - ？
禄佩明齐： there be句型考点预测 〔考点一〕there be句型的结构 〔解析〕英语表示“什么地方或时间存在什么人物”,常用“there +be +名词+地点(时间)状语”结构. 这种句子结构中的there是个引导词,本身无词义.系动词be是谓语动词,其后的名...
